proper 🔩Jan 20, 2025·2 repliesmight do a rewatch today
now that i know i can leave after the intermission and not miss much if i don’t feel like staying the full 4 hours lol
Jan 20, 2025·1 replypropermight do a rewatch today
now that i know i can leave after the intermission and not miss much if i don’t feel like staying the full 4 hours lol
Can I go?
- proper 🔩Jan 20, 2025·1 replyOscar Winner
Can I go?
ofc
- Jan 20, 2025·1 replyproper
ofc
And then Sundance this weekend?
- proper 🔩Jan 20, 2025·1 replyOscar Winner
And then Sundance this weekend?
i’m actually going this year bro
- Jan 20, 2025·1 replyproper
i’m actually going this year bro
Lmao cap what movies you got
- proper 🔩Jan 20, 2025·1 replyOscar Winner
Lmao cap what movies you got
jk bro
i like movies but not enough to wanna do all that just to watch some early
- Jan 20, 2025·1 replyproper
jk bro
i like movies but not enough to wanna do all that just to watch some early
https://twitter.com/shakexcellence/status/1881370687669240110Lmaooooooooo nah that video mad funny I gotta watch the full thing.
But word bro I’m seeing the new Rose Byrne/ASAP Rocky movie and the new Ayo movie
Jan 20, 2025·2 repliesOscar WinnerLmaooooooooo nah that video mad funny I gotta watch the full thing.
But word bro I’m seeing the new Rose Byrne/ASAP Rocky movie and the new Ayo movie
Why you not watching Love, Brooklyn with Nicole Beharie and Andre Holland??
- Jan 20, 2025·1 replyearthwalka
Why you not watching Love, Brooklyn with Nicole Beharie and Andre Holland??
It was sold out brother. I might get it online though
- Jan 20, 2025·1 replyearthwalka
Why you not watching Love, Brooklyn with Nicole Beharie and Andre Holland??
That and Ricky
- Jan 20, 2025·1 replyOscar Winner
It was sold out brother. I might get it online though
Wait you going in person??
- Jan 20, 2025Oscar Winner
That and Ricky
Damn I guess it’s a good thing because people are interested tho
- Jan 20, 2025earthwalka
Wait you going in person??
Duh of course
- proper 🔩Jan 21, 2025proper
might do a rewatch today
now that i know i can leave after the intermission and not miss much if i don’t feel like staying the full 4 hours lol
nvm
but def need to get one more watch in before it leaves theaters this week
Jan 21, 2025·edited·1 replyOscar WinnerAlso I think when they said the two people got injured and hospitalized they should’ve shown that s\*\*\* go down, or instead did a scene of the men working and someone getting brutally injured and make a big set piece outta it. Sorta like the big explosion scene on TWBB when the son lost his hearing. I don’t really like the whole characters just talking about it “oh some s\*\*\* happened and some people got hurt” and then Guys character freaks out and starts firing everyone. It could’ve been a good scene to add to the 2nd half to keep the momentum going
they did. it was the overloaded train derailing
- Jan 21, 2025·1 replyTrap a holic
they did. it was the overloaded train derailing
??
- proper 🔩Jan 21, 2025·1 replyOscar Winner
??
the train scene where it shows it blowing up/catching on fire on the rails
- Jan 21, 2025proper
the train scene where it shows it blowing up/catching on fire on the rails
Hmm don’t remember it, prolly was a quick boring scene. Reshoot it.
- proper 🔩Jan 21, 2025·edited·2 replies
these two posts from reddit making me look at the ending in a new light. can’t wait to rewatch now (my b if this s*** was obvs im dumb. shout out all the deep thinkers and smart ppl who love explaining the symbolism and metaphors and endings etc of movies on reddit tho
)“The Big Picture interview with Brady Corbet where he explained that the structure of the film was sort of influenced by the idea of trusting an artist when they’re dabbling in breaking the form. Meaning, when you see an abstract artist, you want to know they’re capable drawing a beautiful, classic portrait. To be able to appreciate transgression in art you first need to witness the depiction of beauty. Sort of like Corbet saying ‘yes, I can do the thing you all want me to do but this is what I want to say with it.’ That concept significantly raises my opinion on the second half. A blunt Trojan horse, form following function and vice versa in the tradition of brutalism. The very structure of the movie in lock step with the story itself.
Then, the blow of the epilogue pulls everything back together despite the second half breaking it all down. The structure is sound but you might not like it. It does kind of leave you wishing Corbet just built us a cathedral but he insists on the cold concrete of brutalism. I totally get it if you don’t like it. But I don’t think this would be as major a work without that second half.”
“Maybe I'm wrong here, but for a 3+ hour movie mainly about Brody's character saying he wants his work to speak for itself, and nothing explains a cube better than it's design, to see an ending where somebody else proceeds to "explain" his masterwork when he himself is no longer able to, and the explanation for said work seems to in some cases directly contradict what we've seen onscreen, and is only said when he himself is unable to argue against it...to see all of that and feel we're supposed to see the niece's speech as accurate to Brody's intent instead of a final ironic twist just seems like an odd interpretation to me.”
i like this interpretation. giving tar ending vibes lol.
Jan 21, 2025·1 replyproper· editedthese two posts from reddit making me look at the ending in a new light. can’t wait to rewatch now (my b if this s*** was obvs im dumb. shout out all the deep thinkers and smart ppl who love explaining the symbolism and metaphors and endings etc of movies on reddit tho
)“The Big Picture interview with Brady Corbet where he explained that the structure of the film was sort of influenced by the idea of trusting an artist when they’re dabbling in breaking the form. Meaning, when you see an abstract artist, you want to know they’re capable drawing a beautiful, classic portrait. To be able to appreciate transgression in art you first need to witness the depiction of beauty. Sort of like Corbet saying ‘yes, I can do the thing you all want me to do but this is what I want to say with it.’ That concept significantly raises my opinion on the second half. A blunt Trojan horse, form following function and vice versa in the tradition of brutalism. The very structure of the movie in lock step with the story itself.
Then, the blow of the epilogue pulls everything back together despite the second half breaking it all down. The structure is sound but you might not like it. It does kind of leave you wishing Corbet just built us a cathedral but he insists on the cold concrete of brutalism. I totally get it if you don’t like it. But I don’t think this would be as major a work without that second half.”
“Maybe I'm wrong here, but for a 3+ hour movie mainly about Brody's character saying he wants his work to speak for itself, and nothing explains a cube better than it's design, to see an ending where somebody else proceeds to "explain" his masterwork when he himself is no longer able to, and the explanation for said work seems to in some cases directly contradict what we've seen onscreen, and is only said when he himself is unable to argue against it...to see all of that and feel we're supposed to see the niece's speech as accurate to Brody's intent instead of a final ironic twist just seems like an odd interpretation to me.”
i like this interpretation. giving tar ending vibes lol.
This is very similar to my take away of the end
Also got tar vibes lol, same type of downer but not one that leaves you sad. Just makes you say “damn..”
- Jan 21, 2025Ava
This is very similar to my take away of the end
Also got tar vibes lol, same type of downer but not one that leaves you sad. Just makes you say “damn..”
Tar vibes good comparison
- Jan 21, 2025·1 replyproper· edited
these two posts from reddit making me look at the ending in a new light. can’t wait to rewatch now (my b if this s*** was obvs im dumb. shout out all the deep thinkers and smart ppl who love explaining the symbolism and metaphors and endings etc of movies on reddit tho
)“The Big Picture interview with Brady Corbet where he explained that the structure of the film was sort of influenced by the idea of trusting an artist when they’re dabbling in breaking the form. Meaning, when you see an abstract artist, you want to know they’re capable drawing a beautiful, classic portrait. To be able to appreciate transgression in art you first need to witness the depiction of beauty. Sort of like Corbet saying ‘yes, I can do the thing you all want me to do but this is what I want to say with it.’ That concept significantly raises my opinion on the second half. A blunt Trojan horse, form following function and vice versa in the tradition of brutalism. The very structure of the movie in lock step with the story itself.
Then, the blow of the epilogue pulls everything back together despite the second half breaking it all down. The structure is sound but you might not like it. It does kind of leave you wishing Corbet just built us a cathedral but he insists on the cold concrete of brutalism. I totally get it if you don’t like it. But I don’t think this would be as major a work without that second half.”
“Maybe I'm wrong here, but for a 3+ hour movie mainly about Brody's character saying he wants his work to speak for itself, and nothing explains a cube better than it's design, to see an ending where somebody else proceeds to "explain" his masterwork when he himself is no longer able to, and the explanation for said work seems to in some cases directly contradict what we've seen onscreen, and is only said when he himself is unable to argue against it...to see all of that and feel we're supposed to see the niece's speech as accurate to Brody's intent instead of a final ironic twist just seems like an odd interpretation to me.”
i like this interpretation. giving tar ending vibes lol.
“Cheer”
- proper 🔩Jan 21, 2025·1 replyOscar Winner
“Cheer”
??
- Jan 21, 2025·1 replyproper
??
It’s
But good post homie don’t question me