spongebob

4y

That's weak at best

unless there's more

But they're gonna use that STUPID ass IG story he posted too

hottie

4y

Couldn't that IG post be used as proof that he wouldn't k*ll lucci since he likes what he does for his kids and his mom?

Antidote

4y

They took down the leaksite to prevent using leaks lyrics as evidence

Stringerr

4y

man u see gunnas face it’s over

Culture

4y

The POWER 105 interview can be used as defense that he has no issues with Lucci lol

All this is weak AF

they’re hoping someone rats

Silas

4y

They have evidence dating back to 2013. They definitely spend time on this case.

The DA herself said theres alot of resources on this case.

"Very shortly after me becoming the DA, I sat down with Mr. Thomas’ mother and I made her a promise that her son was as valuable as any other person within our community, and that I would put resources on this case, and that I would do everything that I could to make sure that her son had justice. And yesterday was a proud day for me.”

hottie

4y

Couldn't that IG post be used as proof that he wouldn't k*ll lucci since he likes what he does for his kids and his mom?

Scratchin Mamba

4y

McCarthyism is back, iykyk....

Antidote

4y

They took down the leaksite to prevent using leaks lyrics as evidence

Scratchin Mamba

4y

McCarthyism is back, iykyk....

Silas

4y

yes but they got evidence on him trying to kill YFN Lucci twice

you dont make threats to a rival gang leader on social media like that.

orangetcovid

4y

If YSL records not a real company alot of this s*** we see is just smoke and mirrors. Labels f***ing pimps

hottie

4y

Couldn't that IG post be used as proof that he wouldn't k*ll lucci since he likes what he does for his kids and his mom?

BIG BOSS KINO

4y

What if Jeffery Williams shows up to be Young Thug's lawyer on some Mankind s***

Antidote

4y

They took down the leaksite to prevent using leaks lyrics as evidence

hayabusa

4y

free political prisoner thug

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely