I think we’re playing with two definitions here
i think im just jaded bro. i've had 2 oe 3 cool relationships in my life so im not a stranger to consensual loving relationships but it's just annoying how conditional things become as you get older
But we are talking about women in s***work? In this specific thread? Right now?
Yes, but I saw the way you were tryna frame it lmao
What women do with their bodies is entirely their decision
So glad I’m married
These conversations are daunting
it's rough out here man
f***ed up my last relationship 2 years ago and while having casual s***again is cool the people out here are all cooked
So glad I’m married
These conversations are daunting
Yes, but I saw the way you were tryna frame it lmao
What women do with their bodies is entirely their decision
I promise you I am not trying to frame it anyway. What I described is basic feminism
You have all the talking points from this book but it's clear you haven't read past the quotations
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toward_a_Feminist_Theory_of_the_State
Highly recommended
$$$
How the parlay looking
How the parlay looking
I only dropped money on +7.5 spread before the game started but now I wish I dropped more on the ML after half time
I agree. Markets are not neutral and s***work can be an exploitative industry. But this is one specific type of s***worker and they are definitely at whims of economic exploitation
The problem with you and other RFs is you collapse all forms of s***work (high end escorting, p***, survival sex) into one category then police said category with one rule to fit all
I find it incredulous men would understand that it's wrong to jail petty weed offenders like they were pushing kilos of heroin but women's bodies is mystifying?
smoked him twice
the johns and john adjacents get very upset when you point out you're purchasing sexual consent you would never have otherwise. certainly it's not coercive in any way at all if the woman isn't attracted to you and is only doing it for financial reasons
the johns and john adjacents get very upset when you point out you're purchasing sexual consent you would never have otherwise. certainly it's not coercive in any way at all if the woman isn't attracted to you and is only doing it for financial reasons
I like how this doesn't apply to Jaw Morant at all lmao
I like how this doesn't apply to Jaw Morant at all lmao
yeah 99.99% of johns aren't lil baby level celebrities bro they're people like you
the johns and john adjacents get very upset when you point out you're purchasing sexual consent you would never have otherwise. certainly it's not coercive in any way at all if the woman isn't attracted to you and is only doing it for financial reasons
what if she is attracted to you
if you think a girl wouldn't make you pay just because she's attracted to you then you probably haven't talked to many prostitutes lol
yeah 99.99% of johns aren't lil baby level celebrities bro they're people like you
Exactly. With this in mind, read all my posts across these pages and you'll understand why your worldview is incompatible with s***work policy preferences
Like what do people like you two even hope to achieve? You don't want buyers criminalised, you don't want s***workers protected
my brother in christ, every grown man does
My wife is the bread winner she pays for MY p****