Y’all really have never learned this?
We not talking about mowing lawns, sexual consent is a wholeeeee other ballgame man
Put it like this to all yall arguing with him:
What would be worse: mowing someone’s lawn without their consent, or having s***with someone without their consent?
The answer to this question should tell you that there’s a very big difference here
if paying for consent is so normal and regular why are people getting so upset people don't agree. you guys are the majority opinion right? the anti john ideology is fringe apparently
Argumentum ad Populum
False Consensus Effect
False Dilemma
Nice argument, dumbass
why would you have to purchase consent in that situation if according to you attraction is consent?
Well bcause the escort is trying to make a living
You sound dumb as hell sorry
But to answer your initial point: buying s***is not inherently coercive but it can become coercive if the conditions are exploitative
Only a moron or a 1980s radical feminist would think otherwise, so which one are you?
You fake intellectuals kill me on here
Consent is such a word yall need to be defining more lol the material circumstances surrounding why individuals engage in this or that labor to procure a living isn’t a constant variable.
Most of us consent to get paid weekly or biweekly or whatever b/c we need a wage to procure food and rent that doesn’t mean we agree with the fundamental economic and social relations underpinning our need to work and “consent” via contract
Well bcause the escort is trying to make a living
yeah exactly. that's my entire point
Argumentum ad Populum
False Consensus Effect
False Dilemma
Nice argument, dumbass
now say it like a normal person
Well bcause the escort is trying to make a living
nah bro wtf she thinks you're hot she's just supposed to forget she's a prostitute and drop everything and come live with her handsome hubby king
Only reason I joined this thread was to call out lame niggas who pay for p**** and lame niggas who defend it and now this nigga talking about radfem talking points
Consent is such a word yall need to be defining more lol the material circumstances surrounding why individuals engage in this or that labor to procure a living isn’t a constant variable.
Most of us consent to get paid weekly or biweekly or whatever b/c we need a wage to procure food and rent that doesn’t mean we agree with the fundamental economic and social relations underpinning our need to work and “consent” via contract
They genuinely don't believe in their argument; they just wanted to be different. You won't have a response to this from either
They genuinely don't believe in their argument; they just wanted to be different. You won't have a response to this from either
I do believe it but I’m not spending another three hours on here writing full on essays with thesis statements to prove it to you
in a world without needing money to survive and live would there be s***work? if you could not purchase consent would people still have the right to access it otherwise?
Only reason I joined this thread was to call out lame niggas who pay for p**** and lame niggas who defend it and now this nigga talking about radfem talking points
Because your point took it a bit too far.
bet, you're still a john and less of a man because of it regardless of what s***worker policy is lmao
Because your point took it a bit too far.
It really did not. Like I said, I’m not the first person to say that idea. What @PhilipMorris said sums up my point
in a world without needing money to survive and live would there be s***work? if you could not purchase consent would people still have the right to access it otherwise?
if people didn't need money to survive would working still exist?
yes