Reply
  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    MiguelMeyerz

    You're right. This is tricky because it's hard to split ownership of art or IP. It's not like a company or other types of assets.

    But I think the label should pay for the ownership rights. I think that's my position. An artist doesn't own a painting after it's been paid for. A writer doesn't own a script after it's been paid for.

    And I'll say again. The music business was formed on predatory behavior.

    Music business is slimey AF. The artist are the ones that have to change it but they can't keep signing the same BS.

    I agree but artist are paid royalties on the work that is technically the label paying them for the art

  • SABMAN TURNT 🧔🏻
    Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    pneumonia

    Imagine making this thread.

    op is a literal record label shill. ban him honestly

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Tomtom2

    The label doesn't own the likeness.

    However, if Lebron, Jordan, or any player wants to use game footage for anything they have to get the NBA's permission because they own the games that they played as NBA employees.

    The NBA is not going to give Lebron or Jordan money off the game footage they own.

    The NBA was a bad example on my end because a label isn't necessary to the recording process for most acts today the way that the NBA is kinda necessary for basketball games exclusively featuring the top 500 players in the world

    I was basically trying to say that the way a label gets to clear and profit off of an artists' creation forever it would be f***ed if people had to go to the NBA to use their own name on a sneaker or some s*** like that the way labels decide who can sample a master they own

    It's just a f***ed system if you've actually been a creator and all these folks are doing is marketing you and leveraging decade old relationships and then being greedy with peoples art over that small aspect of the music to consumer relationship. Especially now that MTV and s*** don't really exist and you can get on the Vlad's/Breakfast Club/etc. with agency's and phone calls

    Also sometimes (likely majority of the time) labels do own likenesses, i.e. Snoop Doggy Dogg becoming Snoop Dogg when he goes to No Limit

  • Sep 23, 2020

    universal propaganda wont work here !

  • soccerfanj

    Y’all want people to be slaves so bad

  • Sep 23, 2020
    Tomtom2

    I understand all artist want their masters for the money that it provides. However, most of these artist catalogs are worth what they are because of the label.

    The label promotes, hires producers, hires writers, pays for radio play, streams, videos etc...

    I get they are the talent but the label fronts cash so they can be popular. Signing the contract makes you an asset to the label that they in turn invest in. Then as in any business, they will want and deserve a return on investment.

    Why should the artist after the label makes them popular just feel entitled to their masters.

    Kyser is that you?

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    SABMAN TURNT

    the label does own the likeness in many deals, bc that’s part of their predatory tactics

    Also, I am not saying labels aren't slimey. I am just saying the same thing has been happening for years. The artist at some point have to change the practice.

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    Not really lol

    They’re the money

  • SABMAN TURNT

    op is a literal record label shill. ban him honestly

  • Sep 23, 2020

    at least op put out an unpopular opinion. some of you put out s*** like "unpopular opinion: future is really cool"

  • snowchild ❄️
    Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    op prolly says all lives matter too

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    It expires after 35 years but thats too long

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    It goes back to them iirc

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    How do u get to the fans

  • Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    nikedon

    How do u get to the fans

    Ask any independent artist

  • SABMAN TURNT 🧔🏻
    Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Tomtom2

    Also, I am not saying labels aren't slimey. I am just saying the same thing has been happening for years. The artist at some point have to change the practice.

    the artists aren’t the ones who’ve been in business this long. you’re making it seem like artists are reincarnated with memory of their past lives every time they sign a deal with labels.

    it’s new artists with no knowledge of the industry signing with labels who’ve been predatory for decades. of course they don’t know better, and the labels know this. that’s why they go after those types of people to sign in the first place. the label does know better though and takes full advantage wherever it can.

    you’re literally victim blaming the artists for getting duped by predatory legal practices from labels who you acknowledge have been perfecting their predatory crafts for decades.

    just lock this thread before you make yourself look like even more of a fool.

  • Sep 23, 2020

    Without the artist there wouldn't be anything the label would build on anyway. They are the factory that's making the product they are entitled to the fruit of their labor.

  • Sep 23, 2020
    user

    The NBA was a bad example on my end because a label isn't necessary to the recording process for most acts today the way that the NBA is kinda necessary for basketball games exclusively featuring the top 500 players in the world

    I was basically trying to say that the way a label gets to clear and profit off of an artists' creation forever it would be f***ed if people had to go to the NBA to use their own name on a sneaker or some s*** like that the way labels decide who can sample a master they own

    It's just a f***ed system if you've actually been a creator and all these folks are doing is marketing you and leveraging decade old relationships and then being greedy with peoples art over that small aspect of the music to consumer relationship. Especially now that MTV and s*** don't really exist and you can get on the Vlad's/Breakfast Club/etc. with agency's and phone calls

    Also sometimes (likely majority of the time) labels do own likenesses, i.e. Snoop Doggy Dogg becoming Snoop Dogg when he goes to No Limit

    I agree its a f***ed system. I'm just saying there is a lot of value in promotion and marketing. That's why not always the best artist and songs are the most liked or make the most money

    Hence why Life is Good is played after every video I watch on YouTube. Someone had to pay for that to happen.

    I think there are more avenues now but artist have to be smart enough to take advantage of them.

  • SABMAN TURNT 🧔🏻
    Sep 23, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    snowchild

    op prolly says all lives matter too

    nah he’s worse. he’s a blue lives matter typa guy. probably even says white lives matter to be edgy too.

  • Sep 23, 2020
    Bow_And_Arrow

    Ask any independent artist

    Exactly lol ask them

    The response is literal money, not theorical money lol

    If u wanna be an indie artist, you should have the rights to all your masters but you won’t get those million dollar ad budgets that make these big cultural moments and artists lol

  • Sep 23, 2020
    CactusJackSentYa

    Labels shouldn't do sneaky s*** to try and prevent artists from buying them back. But other than that I agree.

    At the end of the day, they are investing in artists.

    And if you aren't ok with giving up your masters or a portion of it, don't sign the contract. It's that simple.

1
...
4
5
6
...
12